thinking about audience

4 06 2010

How to let audience understand my work is the most important consideration. What I’ve got are my works, but how to combine them and show them to make audience understand better?

My project is about simplicity and complexity, which is really hard to distinguish them from a theme, because they exist in many objects. Now I’ve chosen two kinds of buildings and the complicated scene behind the windows of office building as the objects that contain my aim. So I shouldn’t put too much information in my project, less is more.

So the processing works I did for simplifying the photos should be considered.Do they too much? or Can I make a closer connection with my theme? Because in the processing video much information reduced than previous photo. But the linear moving image is a kind of increasing information at the same time. Audience may ask, “why is linear image, not quadrate, punctate image?”

So in my opinion, I am thinking to use the window shape to create the simplified processing work which looks like we stand outside the office building. In degree show, audience walking around, is inside the building. If I show the image seems like from outside, and has been reduced, the aim of my project will be more obvious and understandable.





research for outcomes

4 10 2009

I’m still looking at more artists and works they did to get some inspirations for outcomes.

MTV HD Crow
A spot by PSYOP

Directed by Marie Hyon, Marco Spier
Design by Marie Hyon, Mate Steinforth, Mato Bilic
3D by Todd Akita, Alvin Bae, Dave Barosin, Laurent Barthalemy, Pakorn Bupphavesa, Damon Ciarelli, Kevin Estey, Jason Goodman, Ajit Menon, Naomi Nishimura, Melanie Tonkin, Lutz Vogel
Flame by Jamie Aguirre, Eben Mears, Joe Vitale
Roto by Ella Boliver, J Bush, Stephania Gallico, Carlos Rosario
Producer Angela Bowen, Lucia Grillo, Brett Goldberg, Chad Nau
Executive Producer Justin Booth-Clibborn

Graphics by dvein.com
Monographs by alextruchot.com
Sound by combustion.ws